This site consists of 5 basic parts : After a short intro this page reviews the
Fostex XR-7 4-tracker.
Part 2
describes how this unit is incorporated into the rack setup I use.
Part 3
deals with recording techniques and mixdown.
Part 4
talks about copy mediums.
Part 5
covers a few often missed details, links to addendums inspired by viewer
mail, contains studio photos, has an
MS Word download
of the entire site, and then links to the
Musician's Resource
pages or to the
Minor Notes
main menu.
Hope you find it informative and entertaining, and feel free to send your
comments to me at
jweyand@minornotes.com
. thanks!
View from the basement:
by Jim Weyand
Part 1 : Overview of Fostex XR-7 4-tracker
Since I was 8 years old I’ve been fascinated with the concept of recording
sound. I was so excited to get my first tape recorder. It was a Midland with
these tiny hard to handle 31/2 " open reels, not much more than a toy, really.
It wasn’t until I got a fancier 5” model that I began to experiment, adding an
extra head for echo effects, putting a switch on the erase head so I could
“overdub”, recording on the tape inside-out for psychedelic backwards effects,
pots on the capstan motor, and on & on. Cassettes were a Godsend for
practicality, but equipment-wise pretty much hack proof. By then, however I was
actually playing music rather than trying to manufacture it, so the cassette
was a perfect no-hassle medium for taping those mom-annoying teeth grinding
Sabbath-wannabe fuzz-chords that at 18 years old were just so cool to play but
never sounded quite so good on playback. Hence the first rule of recording,
especially a whole band : TAPES ALWAYS LIE UNLESS IT SOUNDS GOOD. It wasn’t
until I got my hands on a Teac Simul-Sync 4-track open reel and later the
“Syncaset” rack mount cassette version that I recognized the importance of
single source separation / isolation and the always underestimated crucial
mix-down process. Those early attempts with the Teac yielded some very nice
results that inspired me towards a home studio.
Which brings us to the basement. Many years later, and with what little
earnings I could salvage from countless bar gigs, I’ve slapped together an
extremely modest yet effective and user friendly 4-track studio that uses the
Fostex XR-7 as it’s heart (see
diagram #1a
). The Yamaha 4-track was my first choice but was a little pricey at the
time. Now with hard disks and MD’s you can pick up about any analog 4-tracker
for under $500. Digital is definitely the way to go, but for those of us on a
tight budget it’s still premature to put that Porta05 in the wife’s garage sale
heap.
The XR-7 is the full solenoid transport version of the XR-5, and for that
reason alone is worth the price difference. Push-latch controls work fine on
home decks, but are clumsy and tiring in the perpetual rewind world of song
writing. The XR-7 has 6 channels, 2 with gain, parametric EQ and insert points,
4 channels with 2-band EQ only (plus the 2 FX loops and pan standard on all 6
channels). Personally, I have rarely used all 6 inputs at the same time, even
for drums (I like 4 mics : 1 snare, 2 bass drums, 1 overhead). I would rather
sacrifice those 2 channels and have the trim, inserts and 3-band EQ on the
remaining four. Still not a bad on-board mixer (see
diagram #1b
). The deck itself has a much narrower frequency response than the mixer and
not only must use chromium tape (I use MAXELL XLII 100’s) but the heads need to
be cleaned every few hours actual transport time. The Dolby NR exaggerates this
and at times causes a “sweeping” effect that sounds like the tape is very
slightly sliding up and down against the head. I’ve heard DBX is not as quirky
as Dolby, but it works OK and if I turn it off the tape sounds saturated. What works for me
is I turn the Dolby off BEFORE recording so it doesn't give the input signal that high end
boost. Then I can play it back without Dolby and it has a nice fat sound without sounding "splattered".
The recording controls take a little getting used to, since you can record
direct ( input 1 to track 1, 2 to 2, etc.) or any combo on the board to an
assigned track using the L/R record mode switch. It reads 1-L, 2-R, 3-L, and
4-R which makes it sound like tracks 1 & 3 only record on the left side, but
when a single track is isolated there is no left or right. All this means is if
you are recording with more input channels than tracks, or you’ve got a buddy
or two playing along, the only way to get separated tracks is to pan each input
left or right respectively.
The tape head monitor setup works good, but the term “foldback” Fostex insists
on using threw me right off the bat. It actually works the same as Teac’s
“Simul-sync” head monitor mentioned earlier, except that if you don’t use the
foldback feature on overdubs, every time you punch in, the track records not
only the input signal but records the sound from the other three tracks as well
unless you run direct (1 to 1, 2 to 2, etc.) The input and/or foldback signals
are routed to the headphones, but to play both through the studio monitors you
have to unplug the stereo left or right and plug it into the FB output. The
track volume level and input level are controlled by a separate panpot just
above the fader. To further complicate matters each channel has a switch that
can run the head monitor signal through the effects loop. I’ve yet to find any
use for this whatsoever.
One thing I found very useful that was not even mentioned in the manual is the
ability to loop from the track outputs back to the inputs. If you need to
enhance (or in my case, salvage) two out of four tracks, those two can be run
from track 1,2,3 or 4 out and plugged into inputs 5 & 6. Switch those from L/R
(bus) to INPUT, turn off the main sliders for those two tracks and you can then
utilize the parametric EQ, gain and inserts for compression for those tracks.
That is one reason I stated earlier I’d trade those last 2 channels for full
controls on the other four. You would have full gain, EQ, effects and
compression on everything with no patching or looping at mixdown. Of course,
all 4-trackers have track outputs, but if all the channels are set up the same
the result would be identical to running it in TAPE mode and the loop would
serve no purpose unless you wanted to swap tracks for some reason. Point being,
yes all units in this genre have track outputs for an external mixer, but if
you have the equipment for an outboard mixdown we should be talking at least
8-track here, which is not the topic. What I look for is how much I can squeeze
out of what I’ve got to work with. The XR-7 has inputs 5 & 6 set up as inputs
or main stereo bus, allowing for parametric EQ, compression, etc. over the
entire mix. I use the loops to process each track, routing them directly to the
mixdown deck without any further EQ. More about this in part 3. Changing tape speeds is
a "hidden" feature, and without the maunual you would never figure it out.
To change to normal cassette speed, press the "rehearsal" button and the
"stop" button at the same time. The rehearsal light will start blinking
which means now when you hit play it will run at 1-7/8 speed (the pitch control is disabled
in this mode). To switch back to high speed hit the "rehearsal" button once again.
Why Fostex set this up like that is beyond me.
Although I got off
track
a bit (no pun intended), I think I’ve covered all the non-standard features of
the XR-7. In summary I found the transport section to be smooth and accurate,
the tape guides a little sloppy, the Dolby NR quirky and high biased (I don’t
know if this can be user-tweaked), I loved looping tracks through inputs 5 & 6
because of the full features on those two channels (Still wish it had 2 more),
the head monitor (foldback) is very flexible though a little confusing at
first, and the head monitor effects switches for my money just take up valuable
space. If this sounds like a slam-Fostex session it’s not. I really like this
unit and do not regret buying it. Pound for pound it holds it own against
anything else at that price.
If you enjoy online gaming, this site has reviews and special offers for lots of casinos. This is also my one and only commission banner
for this website.
This is the affiliate service for the above banner. If you have a website or mailing list you can also become an affiliate. I chose this one for it's high ratings and reviews. Definitely legit and
not a fly-by-night company.
These banners will appear once more at the end of part 5 in this series of webpages. Thanks!